Am email this morning confirms that my daughter Kristen Dyer-Campbell is still missing, trapped into the illegal sex-trafficking trade involving local police; her two children are also being sold to pedophiles and raped under the so called PROTECTION of the Department of Child Protection.
Kristen this morning, like yesterday, has so far been forced to take another line of Cocaine (four lines so far this morning) and injected against her consent to force compliance; in addition sign documents she did not understand, at 11:48am (a forced marriage and for the sale of her daughter...).
Thanks to the order for silence, three more police sicides this morning under the direction of a female police boss from the Perfecture of Police, who has ordered the police NOT TO ACT while Kristen is trafficked and raped right under their nose.
THEY SEE EVERYTHING BUT THEY SAY NOTHING - THEIR JOB PROMOTIONS ARE RIDING ON IT!
They are starving my daughter, Kristen Dyer-Campbell, daily so that at time of her calculated THERE ARE NO BULLET WOUNDS (...and her children are always hungry that may result in stunt growth - but they call this Child Protection); a death that is promised to the Police, will be funded with my Estate FOR THEIR SILENCE... a death that they will blame on drugs, the Excessive USE OF Cocaine and Heroin Injections THAT KRISTEN IS REJECTING DAILY but forced to take by bounding and gagging her first.
To this day, I HAVE NOT AUTHORISED THE SALE OF THE MENTIONED ESTATE, NOR IS ANY PART OF IT FOR RENT AND NOT FOR OCCUPATION; COURT ORDERS FOR (A) THE MENTIONED ESTATE AND (B) THAT GIVE ME GUARDIANSHIP FOR MY DAUGHTER AND HER CHILDREN ARE STILL BEING DENIED TO ME BY THE POLICE who have also failed to make contact with me regarding the wherabouts of my daughter, my grandchildren and their and wellfare. My Brother, Sergio Gelicrisio is also missing while supposidly under the direction of the Australian Federal Police
I AM DENIED ALL CONTACT WITH MY FAMILY.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Interfering or Harming Witnesses - Civil Proceedings
Two new offences were created by Sections 39 and 40 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001:
Section 39 creates the offence of intimidating a witness in the course of civil proceedings. An offence is only committed where an act of intimidation occurs after proceedings have been commenced;
Section 40 creates the offence of harming a witness in civil proceedings. For this offence the act must be committed after the commencement of proceedings and within a year of proceedings being finally concluded.
The offences are triable either way. In the magistrates' court the maximum penalty is six months' imprisonment and/or a fine to the statutory maximum. In the Crown Court the maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment and/or a fine.
Section 39 - Intimidation
A person commits an offence contrary to Section 39 when doing to another person:
An act which intimidates, and is intended to intimidate another person (the victim)
Knowing or believing that the victim is, or may be a witness in any relevant proceedings, and
Intending by his act to cause the course of justice to be obstructed, perverted or interfered with, and
The act is done after the commencement of those proceedings.
It is immaterial:
Whether the act is done in the presence of the victim.
Whether the act is done to the victim himself or to another.
Whether or not the intention to cause the course of justice to be obstructed, perverted or interfered with is the predominant intention of the person doing the act.
A witness is defined as a person who provides, or is able to provide information or documentation which might be used in evidence in proceedings, or might confirm other evidence which will or might be admitted in those proceedings, be referred to in the course of evidence given by another witness in those proceedings or be the basis for any cross-examination during those proceedings.
There is a presumption that the Defendant intended to pervert, obstruct or interfere with the course of justice if it is proved that he did an act that intimidated and was intended to intimidate another person, and did the act knowing or believing that the person in question was, or might be a witness in relevant proceedings.
Section 40 - Harming
A person commits an offence contrary to Section 40 when doing to another person:
An act which harms and is intended to harm another person, or
Intending to cause another person to fear harm, he threatens to do an act, which would harm that other person.
The offence is committed where the offender does the act knowing that the person harmed or threatened has been a witness in relevant proceedings, and he does or threatens to do that act because of that knowledge or belief. The act must be committed after the commencement of proceedings and within a year of proceedings being finally concluded.
It is immaterial whether the act in question is carried out in the presence of the person who it is intended to harm, or whether a threat is made in the presence of that person; whether the motive set out in the offence is the predominating one, or whether the harm done or threatened is physical, financial or harms a person or property.
For the purpose of Section 40 a witness is defined as a person who has provided information, a document or something else which was, or might have been used in evidence in the proceedings, or which tended or might have tended to confirm other evidence which was, or could have been given in those proceedings; was or might have been referred to in the course of evidence given by another witness in those proceedings; or was or might have been the basis for cross-examination during those proceedings.
For both Section 39 and 40, relevant proceedings are defined as proceedings in or before:
The Court of Appeal;
The High Court;
The Crown Court;
Any County or magistrates' court,
which are not proceedings for an offence and which were commenced on or after the date these provisions came into force (1st August 2001).
BOOK IV
FELONIES AND MISDEMEANOURS AGAINST THE NATION, THE STATE AND THE PUBLIC PEACE
TITLE III
VIOLATION OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE
French Republic, France - Criminal Code 1994 (2005) EN (1994), available from https://cjad.nottingham.ac.uk/en/legislation/174/, accessed on 01/12/2022.
ARTICLE 434-13
(Ordinance no. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September 2000 in force 1 January 2002)
False testimony made under oath before any court of law or before a judicial police officer acting in the exercise of a rogatory commission is punished by five years' imprisonment and a fine of €75,000.
However, the false witness is exempt from penalty where he retracts his testimony spontaneously before the decision terminating the procedure has been made by the judicial investigating authority or the court of trial.
ARTICLE 434-14
(Ordinance no. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 Article 3 Official Journal of 22 September 2000 in force 1 January 2002)
False testimony is punished by seven years' imprisonment and a fine of €100,000 :
1° where it is procured by the handing over of a gift or a reward ;
2° where the person against whom or in favour of whom the false testimony was committed is liable to a penalty applicable to a felony.
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction over the following offences against its administration of justice when committed intentionally:
(a) Giving false testimony when under an obligation pursuant to article 69, paragraph 1, to tell the truth
Comments